Cases 51 - 60 of 11,094
Ochar v. Ameris Bank
as 1:2024cv01258
Defendant:
Ameris Bank
Plaintiff:
Wilson Ochar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Burke v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00027
Defendant:
John Shoda, Counselor Jarrell, Reagan Coe and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marinaro v. Zeigler et al
as 2:2024cv00418
Defendant:
Parks Zeigler, PLLC, Honorable W. Allan Sharrett, Honorable Vernida R. Chaney and others
Plaintiff:
Oksana Marinaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Shifflet v. Taylor
as 5:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shifflet
Defendant:
C.J. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Hanover County School Board et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Amicus Curiae:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Plaintiff:
Janie Doe
Defendant:
Robert J. May, Lisa Pennycuff and Hanover County School Board
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Civil Rights Education Amendments Act 1972
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01518
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00617
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Allen v. Walker et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Defendant:
Deputy Colonel Brian Huffman, Officer Walker, Officer G. Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
