Cases 71 - 80 of 17,973
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01073
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
King v. Kreyer
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Ashley Lynn King
Defendant:
Seaton Andrew Kreyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stoneybrooke Investors LLC v. McCurry
as 2:2024cv00161
Defendant:
Agness McCurry
Plaintiff:
Stoneybrooke Investors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Locke v. Jacobs et al
as 4:2024cv00052
Defendant:
Eddie Colwell, Warren County, Tennessee, City of McMinnville, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Locke, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00163
Defendant:
Micheal H Hurwitz, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Eric J Young
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gregory v. Quality Care Health Care et al
as 3:2024cv00359
Defendant:
QCHC, Quality Care Health Care and Patrick LNU
Plaintiff:
Tommy Joe Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02622
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SCRUGGS v. Washington County, Tennessee
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
LEEANN M SCRUGGS
Defendant:
Washington County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
