Cases 121 - 130 of 32,919
Hagy v. Nottoway Correctional Center
as 2:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Joe Amorine Hagy
Defendant:
Nottoway Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Haug et al
as 7:2024cv00563
Defendant:
Benard, Fleenor, Trainer and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pilkins v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority-Tazewell et al
as 7:2024cv00564
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority-Tazewell, Officer Geoff Moore and Jason Carver
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lynn Pilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Jullian A. Huffman
Defendant:
Officer R. Hall, Major Brian Parks and Master Officer Wheele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fordham v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00566
Defendant:
J. Dignus, A. Reynolds, R. Cochrane and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamar Fordham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00567
Defendant:
Lisa Hemandy, K.A. Almarode, Unknown I.H.O's and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Thomas Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Defendant:
Officer Cody Ridings, Unknown Defendants 1-5, Officer Austin Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kimble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Demasi v. Leu
as 2:2024cv00526
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Demasi
Respondent:
David Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00524
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Cooper
as 2:2024cv00523
Defendant:
J. Cooper
Plaintiff:
Marcus Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
