Cases 11 - 20 of 24,534
Davis v. Kirk et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Cory J. Davis
Defendant:
Alan S. Kirk, Ashley Scott, Kari Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ardd v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02324
Petitioner:
Nickey Ardd
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Singleton v. Nashville Police Dept. et al
as 2:2024cv02332
Plaintiff:
Timothy Singleton
Defendant:
Nashville Police Dept., City of Nashville, Tennessee State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02323
Petitioner:
Tony Dewayne Robinson
Respondent:
Warden C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kimes v. USA
as 2:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Andy Dennison Kimes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wethington v. Parris et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wethington
Defendant:
Mike Parris, Stacy Oaks, Shawn Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burchfield v. Grimes
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Robert W Burchfield
Defendant:
FNU Grimes and FNU Anderly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilchrease v. Dickerson
as 2:2024cv02320
Petitioner:
Victericka Gilchrease
Respondent:
Stanley Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Marcus V. Green
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 2:2024cv02319
Plaintiff:
Derek Lucas and Derek Lashun Lucas
Defendant:
United States Department Of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Warden at Federal Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
