Cases 21 - 30 of 32,516
Brown v. Knowles
as 7:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Brown
Defendant:
Brian Knowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, D. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00668
Petitioner:
Timothy James Thomas
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
Edward L. Watson and Leonard Watson
Respondent:
Chadwick K. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grant v. USA
as 3:2024cv00458
Petitioner:
Briceton Richard Grant
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Vines v. Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Clayton Vines
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Reaves
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections and David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
