Cases 31 - 40 of 29,073
Ouellete #766867 v. Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Scott Mitchell Ouellete #766867
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board and Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Profit #389088 v. Rasmussen et al
as 1:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bernard Profit #389088
Defendant:
Unknown Rasmussen, Unknown Johnson, Michael Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gee #792888 v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
TyJuan Gee #792888
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, P. Hubble, Unknown Naeyart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holbrook #767925 v. Michigan, State of
as 1:2024cv00569
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Charles Judson Holbrook #767925
Respondent:
Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas #246713 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Danyell Thomas #246713
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder, James Vereb, Unknown Ekholm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv11454
Petitioner:
Latausha Simmons
Respondent:
Raphael Washington, Kim Worthy, James White and others
Simmons v. Wickersham et al
as 1:2024cv11453
Petitioner:
LaTausha Simmons
Respondent:
Anthony Wickersham, Peter Lucido and William Dwyer
Thompson v. Michigan, State of
as 2:2024cv11426
Petitioner:
Misty Leann Thompson
Respondent:
Michigan, State of
Holbrook #767925 v. Morrison
as 1:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Charles Judson Holbrook #767925
Defendant:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. USA
as 2:2024cv11421
Petitioner:
Juan Ramirez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
