Cases 31 - 40 of 50,312
IN RE: JERRELL ROBINSON
as 2:2024cv01509
Plaintiff:
JERRELL ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWERS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2024cv00803
Petitioner:
BRANDON BOWERS
Respondent:
Superintendent Gina Clark and PETER C. ACKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NAPPER v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
TYWAN NAPPER
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CLARK v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLARK DOUGLAS III
Defendant:
ZAKEN and BUZAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Salsman v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00911
Petitioner:
Chad Michael Salsman
Respondent:
Superintendent Melinda Adams, Michelle A. Henry, Esquire and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE et al
as 2:2024cv02391
Petitioner:
STEVEN MILLER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NASH v. PHILA DISTRICT ATTY et al
as 2:2024cv02437
Plaintiff:
AASIM NASH
Defendant:
PHILA DISTRICT ATTY, PHILA PUB. DEF. and NEW VITAE DR. BEHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIOTT v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv02426
Plaintiff:
JAMIE ELLIOTT
Defendant:
RANITA DAVIS, KIM DAVIS, MICHAEL SEADOG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TERRELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANIELS, WALSTON and SURGI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
