Cases 31 - 40 of 24,958
McClain v. Baker et al
as 0:2024cv03329
Plaintiff:
Johnny I. McClain, III
Defendant:
Andy Baker, Y.C.D.C. Officer and Mrs. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
McClain v. Hewitt et al
as 0:2024cv03330
Plaintiff:
Johnny I. McClain, III
Defendant:
Sgt. Michael Hewitt, Chief Admin John Hicks, Operations Capt. Rodney Hope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Littles v. Days et al
as 1:2024cv03327
Plaintiff:
Dwight Alonso Littles, Jr.
Defendant:
Allyson Days, Waddell Coe and James Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Young v. Wright
as 9:2024cv01898
Petitioner:
Corvin J. Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
SMALLS v. North Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
THERRAN RASHEED SMALLS
Defendant:
North Charleston Police Department, Officer Adams, Officer Jellico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santos v. South Carolina, The State of
as 6:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
Eliseo Santos
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Boyd v. Department of Social Services
as 7:2024cv03287
Plaintiff:
Latasha Monique Boyd
Defendant:
Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Frazier v. Warden Jackson
as 1:2024cv03304
Petitioner:
Johnnie Frazier
Respondent:
Warden Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. The State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv03303
Plaintiff:
Devin Rashad Johnson
Defendant:
The State of South Carolina, Jeremiah S. Freeman and Robert L. Stuckes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rue v. USA
as 4:2024cv01812
Petitioner:
Charles Antonio Rue
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
