Cases 31 - 40 of 24,864
Hollis v. Holloway
as 3:2024cv01103
Petitioner:
Horace Hollis
Defendant:
James Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fleming v. Riverbend Maximum Security Institution et al
as 3:2024cv01105
Defendant:
Eric Goodner, Cortez Sims, John Pollard and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Eller et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Defendant:
Cox and Brian Eller
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merrilees v. Cobble
as 3:2024cv01095
Defendant:
Brett Cobble
Petitioner:
Gregg Merrilees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KIEL v. HARRISON
as 2:2024cv02646
Petitioner:
JAMES KIEL
Respondent:
WARDEN HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watts v. Jacobs et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Defendant:
City of Centerville, Jason Craft, Nurse Robin l/n/u and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery R. Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Renn v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Rob Edward Renn
Defendant:
Well Path, (f/n/u) Watts, Trousdale Turner Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mock v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv01100
Defendant:
Priscillia Kam, Wayne Gunther, Steven Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Mock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Gray v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv02632
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Petitioner:
LaShun Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harmon v. Henderson Case transferred to the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division.
as 3:2024cv01087
Respondent:
Rand Henderson
Petitioner:
Louis Orlando Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
