Cases 51 - 60 of 31,304
Wade v. Lerch et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Shauntay Wade
Defendant:
Kyle Lerch, John Doe #1 and Kennedy Majors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2024cv00385
Defendant:
David Butler, Rich Beck and Troy Hershberger
Plaintiff:
Deondre Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEVAULT v. USA
as 3:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
JAMES DEVAULT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CHERRY v. JOHNSON
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
DANNY CHERRY
Defendant:
BRYANT LAWRENCE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIPP v. CENTURION OF INDIANA L.L.C. et al
as 1:2024cv01568
Defendant:
S. BEDWELL, B. RIGGS, M. VANCE and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH KIPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. ASHER
as 1:2024cv01569
Defendant:
JERRY ASHER
Plaintiff:
CLYDE MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINCESS CALLIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II A/K/A DEJAUNE ANDERSON v. LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
as 1:2024cv01576
Defendant:
LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
Plaintiff:
PRINCESS CALLIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II A/K/A DEJAUNE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. CUSTODY/CORRECTIONAL OFFICER'S/I.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv01579
Defendant:
CUSTODY/CORRECTIONAL OFFICER'S/I.D.O.C. and I.S.R., I.R.T./PENDLETON
Plaintiff:
JAMES JACKSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCARTHY v. STEWART et al
as 1:2024cv01585
Defendant:
J. BOWLING and J. STEWART
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHOAF v. BEDWELL et al
as 1:2024cv01586
Defendant:
BARBARA RIGGS, BEDWELL, CRINEDDIN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHOAF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
