Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 81 - 90 of 30,676
PAYNE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff: NICK D. PAYNE
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA, IDOC, C.I.C. PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkland v. Ombudsman Bureau et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Defendant: Centuerion Health, Charlene A Burkett, English and others
Plaintiff: Martize Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYNER v. UNKNOWN OFFICER et al
as 1:2024cv00635
Plaintiff: NIGEL T. JOYNER
Defendant: UNKNOWN OFFICER, A. FENI, AKENADI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMURRY v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00951
Petitioner: JEROME ROBERT MCMURRY, II
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myles v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00454
Petitioner: John B Myles
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myles v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00455
Petitioner: John B Myles
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunaway v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00441
Petitioner: Chad A Dunaway
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00446
Petitioner: Lyndon C Davis
Respondent: Warden
Not Yet Classified: PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Schererville Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Defendant: Schererville Police Department, Schererville Police Dept, Parker and others
Plaintiff: Robert Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYES v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: ROBERT MAYES
Defendant: FLOYD COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?