Cases 81 - 90 of 1,156
Letourneau v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Devon Denzel Letourneau and Shabazz Be Allah
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Patricia A. Coyne-Fague, Richard Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staveley v. USA
as 1:2022cv00315
Petitioner:
David Staveley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Vidot v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Xavier T. Vidot
Defendant:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague, Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Richard Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeker v. USA
as 1:2022cv00306
Petitioner:
Gregory Meeker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DeBritto v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Timothy DeBritto
Defendant:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague, Lynne Corry, Barry Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gonzalez v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2022cv00174
Petitioner:
Tony G. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bojang v. Rhode Island
as 1:2022cv00182
Petitioner:
Mustapha Bojang
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Onyobeno v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00148
Petitioner:
Wisdom Oghenekaro Onyobeno
Respondent:
Merrick B Garland, United States Marshal Service and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Prout v. Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Justin Prout
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Oral Surgeon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
