Cases 161 - 170 of 31,886
Richmond (ID 89835) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2016cv03058
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Debt Recovery Services, Inc. v. Samy
as 2:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Debt Recovery Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Amro Samy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lemasters et al v. Short et al
as 2:2024cv02350
Plaintiff:
Brian Lemasters and Avery Rademacher
Defendant:
Larry Short, Peter Jones and SKW Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ford v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv03138
Plaintiff:
Willie F. Ford
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Kathy Giffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dexter v. Lucke et al
as 5:2024cv03140
Plaintiff:
Donald Marcellous Dexter
Defendant:
C. Barnett and Jack Lucke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2024cv01140
Plaintiff:
Chendra E. Mitchell
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fry v. Internal Revenue Service
as 5:2024cv03139
Plaintiff:
Brian Jay Fry
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
