Cases 71 - 80 of 96,735
Vossmer et al v. Nevro Corporation
as 4:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Vossmer and Michael Wersching
Defendant:
Nevro Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00609
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lucas v. Falkenrath
as 2:2024cv04168
Petitioner:
Darious A Lucas
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Su v. Dragon Kitchen of Jefferson City, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04167
Defendant:
Danny Cheng and Dragon Kitchen of Jefferson City, Inc. doing business as Dragon Kitchen
Plaintiff:
Julie Su
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Courtney et al v. Mori et al
as 4:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Lakeshia Courtney, Shaquita Whitley and Parrish Smith
Defendant:
Denise Mori, Golden State Foods and Quality Custom Distribution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
***CASE ABANDONED OPENED IN ERROR SEE 3:24-05076-CV-SW-RK *** Caldwell v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv03271
Petitioner:
John R Caldwell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
