Cases 81 - 90 of 49,568
White v. Coffman et al
as 3:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
David White
Defendant:
Dave Coffman, Mark Bransom and Klamath River Renewal Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott Management, LLC v. Silva et al
as 3:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Scott Management, LLC
Defendant:
Troy Silva and Maria Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gabriel v. Kotek et al
as 3:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
Ryan Dean Gabriel
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Ellen Rosenblum and Meagan Aileen Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allstate Indemnity Company v. Eckles et al
as 3:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Defendant:
nathaniel cyrus eckles, STEPHANIE KELLAMS, MELEESA JOY YESASHIMWE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1182 Immigration & Nationality Act of 1990
Whitman v. LifeMap Assurance Company
as 3:2024cv00757
Petitioner:
Nell Whitman
Defendant:
LifeMap Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Tolbert v. Polk County Jail
as 3:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Tolbert
Defendant:
Polk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mangone v. Fitness Equipment Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Danielle Mangone
Defendant:
Fitness Equipment Services, LLC a Utah limited liability company doing business as Sole Fitness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ash v. City of Portland
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Ash
Defendant:
City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Kotek et al
as 1:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Chad Johnson
Defendant:
Tina Kotek and Kris Strickler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
