Cases 1 - 10 of 1,229
Muhammad et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kariem Qaadir Muhammad, Jamual Famin Muhammad, Danny Dermill Daniels and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Denver, City of and Aurora, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torkelsen v. Braun
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Torkelsen
Defendant:
Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. State of North Dakota et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Robert Williamson
Defendant:
State of North Dakota, Chad Pringle, Dave Krabbenhoft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wymore v. USA
as 1:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Bradwin Earl Wymore
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Walker v. USA
as 1:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Derrick Stephen Walker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Abdikarim v. Fargo, City of et al
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Fargo, City of, Chief of Police Fargo, ND, Chief of Police West Fargo, ND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schutz v. USA
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Kayla Marie Schutz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Anthony Jermaine Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Landis v. Krabbenhoft
as 1:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Douglas E. Landis
Respondent:
Dave Krabbenhoft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlson v. Burdick
as 1:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Sergei Isaac Scott Carlson
Respondent:
Birch P. Burdick and Joseph Joyce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
