Cases 21 - 30 of 653
US v. Feliciano-Rodriguez
as 23-1706
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WILFREDO FELICIANO-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Wilfre
Interested Party:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Arbogast v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 23-1591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT ANDREW BRACKETT ARBOGAST
Defendant / Appellee:
PFIZER, INC., SHEEHAN, PHINNEY, BASS & GREEN PA, JOHN J. BRACK and others
US v. Feliciano-Rodriguez
as 23-1520
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WILFREDO FELICIANO-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Wilfre
Interested Party:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Oliver v. Michaud, et al
as 23-1518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, MARY S. MCELROY, Individual and Official Capacity, JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., Individual and Official Capacity and others
Arbogast v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 23-1481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT ARBOGAST and BRENT ANDREW BRACKETT ARBOGAST
Defendant / Appellee:
PFIZER, INC., SHEEHAN, PHINNEY, BASS & GREEN PA, JOHN J. BRACK and others
Seafreeze Shoreside, Inc., et al v. US Dep't of the Interior, et al
as 23-1473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Interested Party:
VINEYARD WIND 1, LLC
Quinones v. Frequency Therapeutics, Inc., et al
as 23-1393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIAN QUINONES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
PAUL EVANS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and MICHAEL HINGSTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
FREQUENCY THERAPEUTICS, INC., DAVID L. LUCCHINO and CARL LEBEL
Interested Party:
PARAG PATEL and JOHN PRATT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
