Cases 41 - 44 of 44
Silverstrand Investments, et al v. Amag Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-2063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SILVERSTRAND INVESTMENTS, BRIARWOOD INVESTMENTS, INC. and SAFRON CAPITAL CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
AMAG PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BRIAN J.G. PEREIRA, DAVID A. ARKOWITZ and others
US, et al v. Abbott Laboratories, et al
as 11-1336
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel. David M. Kammerer, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ex rel. David M. Kammerer, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. David M. Kammerer and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KAMMERER
Defendant - Appellee:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ALZA CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Interested Party:
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ORGANIZATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al
as 09-1196
Not Classified By Court:
PURDUE PHARMA COMPANY, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BEN VENUE LABORATORIES INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENNETH VANDERWAL, VERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. JOYCE HOWE
Defendant / Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Fernandez-Vargas, et al v. Pfizer Pharm, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-2632
Plaintiff:
EMMA FERNANDEZ-VARGAS and CHRISTIAN JAIME PAGAN-FERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, A, B AND C INSURANCE COMPANIES and LUIS ADORNO-CABAN
Defendant - Appellant:
EMMIBEL PAGAN-SANCHEZ, REYSHA PAGAN-SANCHEZ and ANABEL SANCHEZ-VALLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.