Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Efreom, et al v. McKee, et al
as 21-1382
Plaintiff / Appellant: BARBARA A. MOUSSALLI, PAMELA J. DELVECCHIO, ADRIENNE R. DIMEO and others
Defendant / Appellee: EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through Frank J. Karpinski, its Executive Director, SETH MAGAZINER, in his capacity as Chairperson of the Retirement Board and DANIEL J. MCKEE, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Rhode Island
Plaintiff: GREGORY MARCELLO
Sosa v. Mass. DOC., et al
as 20-2051
Defendant: LINDA ALBOHN, MPCH Grievance and Appeal Coordinator in her official and individual capacities, GUIDO GUEVARA, MPCH Registered Nurse for MCI-Cedar Junction in his official and individual capacities, JOHN MARSHALL, former Superintendent, MCI-Cedar Junction in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant / Appellee: ANN EVANS, MPCH Licensed Nurse for MCI-Cedar Junction in her official and individual capacities, VANESSA RATTIGAN, MPCH Health Services Administration for MCI-Cedar Junction in her official and individual capacities, CAROL HIGGINS O'BRIEN, Commissioner of Department of Corrections in her official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHE BLAKE SOSA
Snell v. Neville, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2018
Defendant / Appellee: PATRICIA RUZE, MONSERRATE QUINONES, STEPHANIE Y. COLLINS and others
Defendant: THOMAS DEMOURA, THERESA SMITH, CLESELY M. GARCIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: EMORY G. SNELL, JR.
Yan, et al v. ReWalk Robotics Ltd., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1614
Plaintiff: JACKIE888, INC., QIAN DENG, NARBEH NATHAN and others
Defendant / Appellee: LARRY JASINSKI, JEFFRIES LLC, REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. and others
Petitioner / Appellant: JOANNE GELLER
Plaintiff / Appellant: WANG YAN, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated parties
Doe, et al v. Pawtucket School Department, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1458
Defendant / Appellee: SHAUN W. STROBEL, in his capacity as Pawtucket City Treasurer, KAREN DUBE, in her individual and official capacity as a teacher and member of the Pawtucket Learning Academy, KERRI DAY, in her individual and official capacity as a teacher and member of the Pawtucket Learning Academy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARY DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, a minor and in her own right and JANE DOE, a minor in and for her own behalf and in her own right
Roy, et al v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.
as 17-1108
Defendant: DAKOTA MINNESOTA AND EASTERN RAILROAD CORPORATION, d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway and SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway
Plaintiff: JACQUES GRENIER, VARIETE CLAUDE CHARRON INC, PATRICK RODRIGUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GUYLAINE ST-LAURENT, as representative of the Estate of Natachat Gaudreau, deceased, DENISE DUBOIS, LUC LAFONTAINE and others
Defendant / Appellee: CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
US v. Rittall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2475
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: JOANN C. RITTALL
Adamo, et al v. Genzyme Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1447
Plaintiff - Appellant: PHILIP ADAMO, JAMES BEADNELL, JOY BEADNELL and others
Defendant: MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
Defendant - Appellee: GENZYME CORPORATION
Fournier v. LePage, et al
as 14-8055
Petitioner: FRANK D. FOURNIER
Respondent: PAUL LEPAGE, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH PONTE, individually and in his official capacity and others
US v. Covai
as 14-1788
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: JOANNE COVAIS, a/k/a Joelle Cuvais

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?