Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 111 - 120 of 140
Rivera-Fernandez v. Loiza, PR, et al
as 09-1829
Plaintiff - Appellant: ELIAS RIVERA-FERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee: AUTONOMOUS MUNICIPALITY OF LOIZA, EDDIE MANSO-FUENTES, in his official capacity as Mayor of Loiza and his personal capacity, LYMARIE ESCOBAR-QUINONES and others
Nunez-Colon, et al v. Toledo-Davila, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1784
Plaintiff - Appellant: MIGUEL A. NUNEZ-COLON, YAZMIN IRIZARRY-CRUZ, D. N. I., Minor and others
Defendant - Appellee: PEDRO TOLEDO-DAVILA, JOEL GONZALEZ-RAMOS, MIGUEL FIGUEROA and others
Defendant: NELSON FONSECA-ROSA, GABRIEL ARENAS-HORTAS and YANITZA NEGRON-ROSADO
Fernandez-Hernandez, et al v. Puerto Rico Police Department, et al
as 09-1718
Plaintiff - Appellant: JUAN FERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, LUIS M. FERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, JOSE RAMON FERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee: PUERTO RICO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, GRISELLE RIVERA-AYALA, CARMELO RAMOS-SOTO and others
Defendant: JANE DOE, JOHN DOE I, INSURANCE COMPANIES and others
Ortiz-Rivera v. Astra Zeneca LP, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1453
Plaintiff - Appellant: DORIS ORTIZ-RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee: ASTRA ZENECA LP
Defendant: INSURANCE COMPANIES A, B, C and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Bromley v. State of UT, et al
as 09-1351
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN L. BROMLEY
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF UT, MARK SHURTLEFF, Utah Attorney General, BEN STONEMAN, Utah Assistant Attorney General and others
Estrada, et al v. State of Rhode Island, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1149
Plaintiff - Appellant: ASTRID G. ESTRADA, WENDY M. ESTRADA, GUILFREDO E. MUNOZ and others
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, State Police Department, STEVEN M. PARE, individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Rhode Island State Police and THOMAS CHABOT, individually and in his official capacity as a state trooper employed by the State of Rhode Island
Defendant: JANE DOE, individually and in her official capacity as a state trooper employed by the state of Rhode Island
: and
Jennings v. Jones We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-2117
Plaintiff: PAULLA DOVE JENNINGS and KEITH HUERTAS
Plaintiff - Appellant: ADAM JENNINGS
Defendant: STEVEN M. PARE, in his representative capacity as Colonel of the Rhode Island State Police, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, KENNETH BELL and others
Defendant - Appellee: KENNETH JONES
Choate v. Merrill, et al
as 08-1959
Plaintiff: BRENDA CHOATE, Personal Represenative of the Estate of Ryan Rideout
Defendant - Appellee: JEFFREY MERRILL, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Warden, Maine Department of Corrections, NELSON REILLY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy Warden, Maine Department of Corrections, MICHAEL PETERS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Prison Guard, Maine Department of Corrections and others
Defendant: ROBERT BEARD, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Prison Guard, Maine Department of Corrections, KATE GERRISH, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Mental Health Worker, Maine Department of Corrections, KATE MATTHEWS, Individually and in her Official Capacity as a Mental Health Worker, Maine Department of Corrections and others
Movant - Appellant: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1921
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mir-Yepez v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1868
Plaintiff - Appellant: MILTON MIR-YEPEZ
Defendant - Appellee: BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, LUIS A. DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ and C/P DIAZ-DOE CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP DIAZ-DOE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?