Cases 11 - 15 of 15
Angel Feliciano-Hernandez v. Miguel Pereira-Castillo, et al
as 11-1052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL LUIS FELICIANO-HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MIGUEL A. PEREIRA-CASTILLO, Former Secretary of the Dept of Corrections & Rehabilitation and Director of Corrections of the Commonwealth of PR, JANE DOE, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP PEREIRA-DOE and others
Garfield v. Flynn, et al
as 09-1486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE GARFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD A. FLYNN, U MASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH UNIT, TARA VENUKRISHNAN and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Wayne Garfield v. U.Mass Correctional Health Uni, et al
as 08-2405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE GARFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
U MASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH UNIT, TARA VENUKRISHNAN and KHALID MOHAMMED, M.D.
Defendant:
PETER A. PEPE, EDWARD A. FLYNN, KATHLEEN DENNEHY and others
Choate v. Merrill, et al
as 08-1959
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CHOATE, Personal Represenative of the Estate of Ryan Rideout
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY MERRILL, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Warden, Maine Department of Corrections, NELSON REILLY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy Warden, Maine Department of Corrections, MICHAEL PETERS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Prison Guard, Maine Department of Corrections and others
Defendant:
ROBERT BEARD, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Prison Guard, Maine Department of Corrections, KATE GERRISH, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Mental Health Worker, Maine Department of Corrections, KATE MATTHEWS, Individually and in her Official Capacity as a Mental Health Worker, Maine Department of Corrections and others
Movant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Poirier v. MA Dept of Correctio, et al
as 08-1290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELISSA J. POIRIER
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT OF CORRECTION and KATHLEEN DENNEHY, individually and in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.