Cases 31 - 40 of 2,552
Brady v. Mosca, et al
as 24-1378
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE BRADY
Defendant:
JENI MOSCA, PAMELA MACDONALD, JEANNE KINCAID and others
Howell v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, et al
as 24-1368
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Howell v. Pine Street Inn, et al
as 24-1369
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
PINE STREET INN, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Howell v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1374
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Howell v. Watertown Public Library, et al
as 24-1370
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
WATERTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY and WATERTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Miller v. Roycroft, et al
as 24-1351
Plaintiff:
IAN MILLER, personal representative of the Estate of Robert Joseph Miller
Defendant:
SPENCER JACKSON, in his individual capacity, TOWN OF BARNSTABLE, MA and SEAN ROYCROFT, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Guzman-Perez, et al v. Ojeda-Batista
as 24-1329
Plaintiff:
JENNIE GUZMAN-PEREZ and MARIA HERNANDEZ-SANTIAGO
Defendant:
MANUEL OJEDA-BATISTA, PROFESSIONAL EQUIPMENT CORP. and MOB INVESTMENT CORP.
Ruiz-Romero v. Candelario-Caliz, et al
as 24-1348
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
HON. ANGEL CANDELARIO-CALIZ, HON. GINNY M. VELEZ-CARRERAS and SECRETARY OF JUSTICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Ruiz-Romero v. Chief Marshal - Office of Summons Ponce, et al
as 24-1347
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
CHIEF MARSHAL - OFFICE OF SUMMONS PONCE, LISSETTE TORO-VELEZ, Court Administrator of Ponce Municipal Court - Judicial Center of Ponce and CHIEF - OFFICE OF ARRESTS & EXTRADITIONS, Ponce Municipality
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
