Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gill, et al v. Morrison Mahoney LLP, et al
as 15-1385
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. GILL
Plaintiff:
THE MORTGAGE SPECIALIST INC
Defendant - Appellee:
MORRISON MAHONEY LLP, NICHOLAS P. ALEXANDER and ERIC E. RENNER
Interested Party:
EDWARD WILLIAM LITTLE, JR. and ANTHONY S. AUGERI
Hara v. Office of Personal Management, et al
as 10-2214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN HARA
Plaintiff:
NANCY GILL, MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, MARTIN KOSKI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and others
Defendant:
HILARY CLINTON
Intervenor:
LAMAR S. SMITH
Gill, et al v. Office of Personnel Management, et al
as 52-2207
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NANCY GILL, MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, MARTIN KOSKI and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH TONEY and ALBERT TONEY, III
Defendant - Appellant:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and others
Intervenor:
LAMAR S. SMITH
Defendant:
HILARY CLINTON
Gill, et al v. Office of Personal Management, et al
as 10-2207
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NANCY GILL, MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, MARTIN KOSKI and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH TONEY and ALBERT TONEY, III
Defendant - Appellant:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and others
Intervenor:
LAMAR S. SMITH
Defendant:
HILARY CLINTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
