Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1540
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe, et al v. Trustees of Boston College, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2290
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN DOE, MARY DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant - Appellee: TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE, PAUL J. CHEBATOR, CAROLE HUGHES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2079
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Gero, et al
as 14-1755
Plaintiff: DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY M. BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: GERALD JONES
Defendant: RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee: CORRECTION OFFICER GERO and CORRECTION OFFICER OPONASET
Interested Party: MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Hughes-Birch, et al v. Honorable McCauley Manzi, et al
as 10-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant: STACEY HUGHES-BIRCH
Plaintiff: LILY HUGHES-BIRCH and LEAH KEFFERSTAN
Defendant - Appellee: MARY MCCAULEY MANZI, JOHN P. CRONIN, RICHARD NARDELLA and others
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2310
Plaintiff: DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant: RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellant: CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Movant - Interested Party: MA PAROLE BOARD
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2139
Plaintiff: DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant: RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee: CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Araujo, et al v. Providence, RI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-2417
Plaintiff: SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant: JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant: JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence and URBANO PRIGNANO, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Chief of Police for the City of Providence
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee: PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its treasurer, Steven T. Napolitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
: and
Jeanty v. US, et al
as 08-2415
Plaintiff - Appellant: RODZ D. JEANTY
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES, DENIS R. HURLEY, in his official capacity as a Judge in the Untied States District Court, Eastern District of New York, ROBERT DOLAN, in his official capacity as Chief, Veterans Benefits and Services Division in New York and others
Walden, et al v. Lennon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1536
Plaintiff: SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant: JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant: VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee: PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its Treasurer, Steven T. Naplitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
: and

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?