Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Price v. State of RI, et al
as 13-2318
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRAIG PRICE
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF RI, PETER F. KILMARTIN, RI Attorney General and A.T. WALL
Blackmer v. NH Attorney General, et al
as 13-1407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL BLACKMER
Defendant - Appellee:
NH ATTORNEY GENERAL and MERRIMACK COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Blackmer v. Wrenn, et al
as 13-1058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL BLACKMER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM L. WRENN, DOC Commissioner, FNU LAMBERTSON, Prison Guard, PAUL FORTIER and others
Interested Party:
NH ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wilborn v. Coakley, et al
as 12-2407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WILBORN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTHA COAKLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL and JONATHAN W. BLODGETT
Wherry v. Bennett, et al
as 12-2337
Appellant:
BENJAMIN J. WHERRY
Defendant:
LISA LIASON, BENNETT, FMC Devens Education Staff Member, THOMAS KANE, BOP Acting Director for Department of Justice and others
Appellee:
CHAPMAN, Records Office Supervisor, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, GALLANT, Case Manager for FMC Devens H-Unit and others
Ibarra-Gonzalez v. Matias-De-Leon, et al
as 12-2268
Petitioner - Appellant:
MOISES IBARRA-GONZALEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JUDITH MATIAS-DE-LEON, Warden and ROBERTO SANCHEZ-RAMOS, Attorney General of Puerto Rico
Murray v. Bledsoe, et al
as 12-2245
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES M. MURRAY, a/k/a James Hines
Respondent - Appellee:
B.A. BLEDSOE and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Prall v. MA Supreme Judicial Court, et al
as 12-2092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
MA SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT, OFFICE OF THE BAR COUNSEL, CITY OF BOSTON, Law Department and others
Watson v. Coakley
as 12-2084
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL WATSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTHA COAKLEY, Attorney General
Heon v. RI Attorney General, et al
as 12-1980
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HEON
Respondent - Appellee:
RI ATTORNEY GENERAL, OFFICE and A.T. WALL, Director of Corrections at the ACI in Cranston, RI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
