Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,677
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1006
Plaintiff: GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant: WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individial capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individial capacity and others
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al v. Paiva
as 23-1919
Petitioner / Appellant: RICHARD LEE PAIVA
Petitioner: NICHOLAS A. PALMIGIANO, WILLIAM J. O'BRIEN, JOHN F. PIERCE and others
Plaintiff: ERIC DAY, WILLIAM THOMAS, DANIEL SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee: RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF RI
Interested Party: KENNETH WILSON, CHRISTOPHER HADLEY, NORMAN WHEELER and others
Johnson v. Municipio de Guayama
as 23-2038
Plaintiff / Appellant: OBE E. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: MUNICIPIO DE GUAYAMA
Rodrigues v. Rodrigues
as 23-2012
Petitioner / Appellant: ANTONIO RODRIGUES
Respondent / Appellee: MICHAEL RODRIGUES, Superintendent, MCI Shirley Medium
Winkleman v. Hazlewood
as 23-1942
Petitioner / Appellant: JOHN F. WINKLEMAN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI Berlin
Duarte v. Frane
as 23-1903
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant / Appellee: DANIELLE FRANE, Superintendent, Norfolk County Correctional Center
Celester v. Rodrigues
as 23-1973
Petitioner / Appellant: JERMAINE CELESTER
Respondent / Appellee: MICHAEL RODRIGUES and MICHAEL RODRIGUES, Superintendent of MCI Shirley
Perez-Vasquez v. US
as 23-2068
Petitioner: NOE SALVADOR PEREZ-VASQUEZ
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Lopez-Soto v. US
as 23-1930
Petitioner / Appellant: CARLOS ENRIQUE LOPEZ-SOTO
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Latham v. Demissie, et al
as 23-1904
Plaintiff / Appellant: LINCOLN LATHAM, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: DEREGE B. DEMISSIE, Lawyer Register at Board of Bar Overseer, BEANIE SIGEL, Singer at Rocafella Records in New York, LUTHER WALLIS, Correctional Officer & Prison Guard and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?