Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sosa v. Mass. DOC., et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
CHE BLAKE SOSA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JAMES J. SABA, former Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, in his official and individual capacities, LUIS S. SPENCER, former Commissioner of the Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Dubois v. Alves, et al
as 22-1704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DUBOIS
Plaintiff:
NATHANIAL DUBOIS and ASHLEY DUBOIS
Defendant / Appellee:
NELSON ALVES, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, CLAUDIA DUBOIS and others
Lopes v. Dickhaut, et al
as 16-2119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANILO LOPES
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent, ANTHONY MENDONSA, THOMAS M. TOCCI and others
Defendant:
JOHN BELAND, PETER WALKER, RANDY FISHER and others
Morales v. Saba, et al
as 16-1334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL MORALES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT JAMES J. SABA, ELENA CLODIUS, HAROLD WILKES and others
Bone v. Healey, et al
as 16-1086
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELSTON BONE
Respondent - Appellee:
MAURA T. HEALEY, Massachusetts Attorney General, NORFOLK SUPERIOR COURT, CAROL HIGGINS O'BRIEN, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Corrections and others
Tuitt v. Spencer, et al
as 15-2507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TUITT
Defendant - Appellee:
LUIS S. SPENCER, in his Official Capacity as the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections, MARK A. CUTLER, individually and in his Official Capacity as a Correctional Officer for the Department of Corrections, ERIC SOLOMON, individually and in his Official Capacity as a Correctional Officer for the Department of Corrections and others
Rojas v. Dionne, et al
as 14-1396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKY ROJAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIONNE, Superintendent, Hillsborough County DOC, in his individual capacity, B. MARINEAU, Deputy Chief of Security, in his individual capacity, MARC CUSSON, Captain, in his individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
