Cases 121 - 130 of 506
In Re: Perez-Soto
as 19-1190
Appellant:
HIRAM I. PEREZ-SOTO
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PUERTO RICO
US v. Valdez
as 19-1129
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
HECTOR VALDEZ, a/k/a Arnaldo Lopez, a/k/a Jose Ocasio, a/k/a Jose Altagracia, a/k/a Jorge Figueroa, a/k/a Hector Nunez, a/k/a Jesus Perez, a/k/a Ramon Alvarez Vegas, a/k/a Hector Bolivar Valdez Nunez, a/k/a Boli
Perez-Montanez v. US
as 19-1147
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PEREZ-MONTANEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Betancourt-Perez v. US
as 19-1088
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGEL ABNER BETANCOURT-PEREZ
Sepulveda-Medina v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al
as 19-1052
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO VELEZ-MARTINEZ, NAYDA ROSA ALVAREZ-MORALES, ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ-VELAZQUEZ and others
Defendant:
ISLAND FINANCE CORPORATION, COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y CREDITO DE CIALES, ROOSEVELT CAYMAN ASSETS COMPANY I and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, OPERATING PARTNERS COMPANY, LLC., UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE MANUEL SEPULVEDA-MEDINA
Mondol, et al v. Somerville, MA, et al
as 17-2076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GALILEO MONDOL, ALISON HINES and MARK MONDOL
Defendant - Appellee:
SOMERVILLE, MA, JOSEPH CURTATONE, ANTHONY PIERANTOZZI and others
Movant - Interested Party:
WHDH-TV and ROSEMBERG PEREZ
US v. Perez-Crisostomo
as 17-1914
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS MANUEL PEREZ-CRISOSTOMO, a/k/a Nelson Calderon
Perez-Rabanales v. Sessions
as 17-1803
Petitioner:
ANA MARINA PEREZ-RABANALES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Perez-Gonzalez
as 17-1754
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
RODERICK PEREZ-GONZALEZ, a/k/a Canito
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
