Cases 11 - 20 of 288
Noel v. Romelus, et al
as 23-2058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD A. NOEL, on behalf of himself and A.G.N. and B.M.N.
Defendant:
BARTHINE ROMELUS, PAUL M. CRONAN, BRAILEY E. NEWTON and others
US ex rel. Morgan-Lee v. Therapy Resources Management, LLC
as 23-2070
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY MORGAN-LEE, UNITED STATES, ex rel, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ex rel and others
Defendant:
THERAPY RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, LLC, WHITTIER HEALTH NETWORK, INC., HEALTH CONCEPTS, LTD, d/b/a Bayberry Commons, d/b/a Eastgate Nursing and Recovery Center, d/b/a Elmwood Health Center, d/b/a Heritage Hills Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, d/b/a Morgan Health Center, d/b/a Pine Grove Health Center, d/b/a Riverview and others
Cotto, et al v. Campbell, et al
as 23-2069
Plaintiff:
STACY FOSTER, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JAMIE KIMBALL, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JONATHAN RILEY, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, Attorney General, TIMOTHY SHUGRUE, Berkshire County District Attorney and others
Mercado v. Department of Social Services, et al
as 23-2009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESLIE MERCADO
Defendant / Appellee:
MA DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, BRENDA COY, Social Worker, FRAN SEAGER, DCF Attorney and others
Beaudoin v. Baker, et al
as 23-1989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN PAUL BEAUDOIN, JR. and JOHN PAUL BEAUDOIN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., MAURA TRACY HEALEY, in her official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, MARGARET R. COOKE, individually and in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Public Health of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Karvelas v. Tufts Shared Services, Inc., et al
as 23-1937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN KARVELAS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES and COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ex rel
Defendant / Appellee:
TUFT SHARED SERVICES, INC., d/b/a Tufts Medical Center, Inc., LESLIE LUSSIER, individually, ALBERT FANTASIA, individually and others
Defendant:
EASCARE, LLC
Arcell, et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, et al
as 23-1897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE R. ARCELL, JOSE M. BRITO, JAN-MARIE BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY NIEBOR, GABRIEL GARAVANIAN and JUNE STANSBURY
Defendant / Appellee:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION and SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES, UNITED AIRLINES, INC., SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. and others
US, et al v. American Airlines Group Inc.
as 23-1802
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. and AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC.
Defendant:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION
Interested Party:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., DELTA AIR LINES, INC., GLEN HAUENSTEIN and others
Melone v. Coit, et al
as 23-1736
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS MELONE
Plaintiff:
ALLCO RENEWABLE ENERGY, LTD. and ALLCO FINANCE LTD
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET COIT, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, JANET COIT, in her official capacity of Assistant Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VINEYARD WIND 1, LLC
Defendant:
DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity of Secretary of the Interior, JOHN A. ATILANO, II, Colonel, in his official capacity of Commander and District Engineer, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity of Principal Deputy Director and others
Intervenor:
SOUTH FORK WIND, LLC
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Zotos v. Hingham, MA, et al
as 23-1694
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERIC PETER ZOTOS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel. Frederic P. Zotos and COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ex rel. Frederic P. Zotos
Defendant / Appellee:
HINGHAM, MA, ROGER FERNANDES, individually and as Town Engineer, TOM MAYO, individually and as Town Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
