Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Reaves v. Department of Correction, et al
as 20-1433
Defendant:
CAROL HIGGINS O'BRIEN, Commissioner, MARIA L. ANGELES, Medical Director, MCI Shirley Medium, KHALID N. KHAN, MD, MD and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHANIE Y. COLLINS, Asst. Deputy Comm. Clinical Services and Director of Health Services Division and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TIMOTHY M. REAVES
Interested Party:
DAVID J. KNEELAND, JR.
Reaves v. Department of Correction, et al
as 19-2089
Defendant:
JOHN MORIN, Deputy Superintendent, MCI Shirley Medium, CAROL HIGGINS O'BRIEN, Commissioner, DIANA GARCIA, RN, Director of Nursing, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHANIE Y. COLLINS, Asst. Deputy Comm. Clinical Services and Director of Health Services Division and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TIMOTHY M. REAVES
Interested Party:
DAVID J. KNEELAND, JR.
Khan v. Lynch
as 15-2569
Petitioner:
HAROON SHAH KHAN
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Khan v. Holder, Jr.
as 13-1442
Petitioner:
PIR KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Khan v. Holder
as 13-1102
Petitioner:
SIRAJ AHMAD KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Khattak, et al v. Holder, Jr.
as 12-1144
Petitioner:
JAVED IQBAL KHATTAK, NAHHED ALAM KHATTAK, FATIMA JAVED and others
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Fowlkes v. Dennehy, et al
as 09-2394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIPE OTEZE FOWLKES
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN M. DENNEHY, KRISTIE LADOUCER, LOIS RUSSO and others
Carter, et al v. Dubois, et al
as 08-2150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN CARTER
Plaintiff:
RAUL CASANOVA, DEMOND HICKS, KEVIN BUSH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD DUVAL, STEVEN AYALA, WILLIAM J. GROSSI and others
Defendant:
LARRY E. DUBOIS, DANIEL J. SULLIVAN, EDWARD KLOS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
