Cases 21 - 30 of 1,817
Phimmady v. Garland
as 24-1330
Petitioner:
SINE PHIMMADY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Cogley v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 24-1309
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COGLEY
Defendant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island Governor 2013-2015 in his official capacity, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Rhode Island Governor 2015-2021 in her official capacity and others
Alay v. Garland
as 24-1299
Petitioner:
LESBIA ASUCENA ALAY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Chanchavac Garcia, et al v. Garland
as 24-1296
Petitioner:
VENTURA CHANCHAVAC GARCIA and ROSA CLEOTILDE TEMA LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS, FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Morgan v. Garland
as 24-1280
Petitioner:
AKEISH JOHNIOY MORGAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Sanches Alves, et al v. Garland
as 24-1258
Petitioner:
MATEUS SANCHES ALVES, FRANCIELE DOS REIS OLIMPIO ALVES and E.M.S.R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Alvarez Mendoza v. Garland
as 24-1260
Petitioner:
JOSE RENE ALVAREZ MENDOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Goncalves Leao v. Garland
as 24-1239
Petitioner:
LEONARDO GONCALVES LEAO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Mondzali Bopaka v. Garland
as 24-1201
Petitioner:
CHRISMA FELIN MONDZALI BOPAKA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
