Cases 31 - 40 of 23,152
Greenleaf Compassionate Care Center, Inc. v. Santacroce, et al
as 24-1259
Plaintiff:
GREENLEAF COMPASSIONATE CARE CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
MATTHEW SANTACROCE, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation, ERICA FERRELLI, in her official capacity as Chief of the Office of Cannabis Regulation within the Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation, KIMBERLY AHERN, in her official capacity as Chair of the Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission and others
Correa E Silva, et al v. Garland
as 24-1471
Petitioner:
RICARDO CORREA E SILVA, AMANDA FORTES DA SILVA CORREA, A. F. D. S. C. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Perez-Gonzalez
as 24-1454
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOSEPH EFRAIN PEREZ-GONZALEZ, a/k/a Peca, a/k/a Stripper
iD Auto, LLC, et al v. IDParts LLC
as 24-1462
Plaintiff:
ID AUTO, LLC and ID AUTO, INC.
Defendant:
IDPARTS LLC
Interested Party:
DLA PIPER LLP and MICHAEL A. GELLER
Griffin v. City of Revere, et al
as 24-1459
Plaintiff:
RICK GRIFFIN
Defendant:
REVERE, MA, BRIAN ARRIGO and MA CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
Paulino, et al v. Bank of New York Mellon N.A.
as 24-1446
Plaintiff:
ALTAGRACIA PAULINO and MILEDY PAULINO-PERALTA
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Trustee for the Certificate Holders of the CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-11, f/k/a Bank of New York
BRT Management LLC v. Malden Storage, LLC, et al
as 24-1229
Plaintiff:
BRT MANAGEMENT LLC
Defendant:
BRIAN WALLACE, MALDEN STORAGE LLC, PLAIN AVENUE STORAGE LLC and others
Interested Party:
STEPHEN P. SANDLER
Meka, et al v. Haddad, et al
as 24-1425
Plaintiff:
ROHINI MEKA and SURESH CHIRUMAMILLA, individually and as father and next friend of PRANAV CHIRUMAMILLA
Defendant:
HANI HADDAD, VALLEY WOMEN'S HEALTH GROUP, LLC and JOHN/JANE DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
