Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Pierce v. Wall
as 09-1902
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN F. PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee: A. T. WALL and PATRICK LYNCH, Attorney General
Pierce v. Dennehy, et al
as 09-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant: GERALD PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN M. DENNEHY, JAN HEBERT, PETER A. PEPE, Deputy Commissioner and others
:
Laurence v. Wall, et al
as 09-1337
Plaintiff - Appellant: NORMAN LAURENCE
Defendant - Appellee: A.T. WALL, JAKE GADSDEN, JAMES WEEDEN and others
Bennett, et al v. Mollis, et al
as 09-1083
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH M. BENNETT, MARGARET MARY MCCORMICK, Individually and on behalf of all other persons similary situated and DOMENIC D'AMBRA, JR.
Plaintiff: GREGORY L. HORTON
Defendant - Appellee: RALPH MOLLIS, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of RI, JOHN A. DALUZ, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Rhode Island Board of Elections, FRANK J. REGO, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Rhode Island Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and RHODE ISLAND AFFILIATE
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Stote, et al v. Maloney, et al
as 08-2205
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN E. STOTE, FRANCIS HANNON, SEAN MILLIKEN and others
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE M. MCARTHUR, WAYNE D. CROSBY, STEVEN BALSAVICH and others
Defendant: MICHAEL T. MALONEY, PETER ALLEN, GARY FYFE and others
Defendant - Appellee: GERI CRISMAN, GURVINDER KAUR JAISWAL and U MASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH UNIT
US v. Pierce
as 08-1785
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: KEONE PIERCE
Pierce v. Wall
as 08-1571
Petitioner: JOHN F. PIERCE
Respondent: A. T. WALL
Laurence v. Wall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1380
Plaintiff - Appellant: NORMAN LAURENCE
Defendant - Appellee: A.T. WALL, GEORGE A. VOSE, JAKE GADSDEN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?