Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
City of Bangor v. Citizens Communicat., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2777
Plaintiff: BANGOR, ME
Defendant - Appellee: CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and STATE OF ME
Defendant: MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC., US DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Defendant - Appellant: DEAD RIVER COMPANY, ROBINSON SPEIRS, JULIE ANN MACMANNIS and others
City of Bangor v. Citizens Communicat., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2759
Plaintiff: BANGOR, ME
Defendant - Appellee: CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and STATE OF ME
Defendant: MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., US DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GUILFORD TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., BEAZER EAST, INC. and others
City of Bangor v. Citizens Communicat., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2255
Plaintiff - Appellee: BANGOR, ME
Defendant - Appellee: CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and STATE OF ME
Defendant: MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC., US DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Defendant - Appellant: DEAD RIVER COMPANY, ROBINSON SPEIRS, JULIE ANN MACMANNIS and others
City of Bangor v. Citizens Communicat., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2193
Plaintiff - Appellee: BANGOR, ME
Defendant - Appellee: CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and STATE OF ME
Defendant: MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., US DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GUILFORD TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., BEAZER EAST, INC. and others
In Re: New Motor, et al, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2258
: NEW MOTOR VEHICLES NEW MOTOR VEHICLES CANADIAN EXPORT ANTITRUST LITIGATION, , and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: JILLIAN R. WEADER, B. ALISON SHARRETT, JASON LEYNER and others
Defendant - Appellant: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, General Motors Corporation, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, General Motors of Canada, Ltd. and NISSAN NORTH AMERICA
Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd., TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: BASS FINEBERG LEAS BASS FINEBERG LEASING INC.
In Re: New Motor, et al, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2259
: NEW MOTOR VEHICLES NEW MOTOR VEHICLES CANADIAN EXPORT ANTITRUST LITIGATION, , and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: GEORGE JAYNES, JANE A. JAYNES, JILLIAN R. WEADER and others
Defendant: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, General Motors Corporation, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, General Motors of Canada, Ltd., TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd., AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR, CO. INC., and others
Defendant - Appellee: BASS FINEBERG LEAS BASS FINEBERG LEASING INC.
Barrett v. Connolly, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-2506
Plaintiff - Appellant: ELAINE BARRETT
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES, JOHN M. MORRIS and ROBERT R. FITZPATRICK
Defendant: H. PAUL RICO, JOHN J. CONNOLLY, RODERICK KENNEDY and others
Zabin, et al v. Picciotto, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 00-2285
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALBERT P. ZABIN, SCHNEIDER, REILL, ZABIN AND COSTELLO, JOEL Z. EIGERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellant: STEFANO PICCIOTTO, JUDITH PICCIOTTO, MELITA PICCIOTTO and others
: ROACH, CARENS ROACH, CARENS & DEGIAGOMO, MICHAEL P. THORNTON, JAMES F. EARLY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?