Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Diaz v. Johnson, et al
as 19-1612
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MEYERS, United States Office of Naval Research (ONR), ANDREI IANCU, United States Patent and Trademark Office, JIM GALAMBOS, Defense Strategic Technology Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN DIAZ
US v. Capelton
as 19-1613
Defendant / Appellant:
JEROME CAPELTON, a/k/a Anthony Coleman
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS
Emhart Industries, et al v. CNA Holdings LLC, et al
as 19-1563
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, UNILEVER, BNS LLC and others
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER COMPANY INC, ROBERT M. GATES, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Defendant / Appellee:
US NAVY, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES and others
Interested Party:
DOW INC., f/k/a Dow Chemical Company, RHODES TECHNOLOGIES INC and WIN NOREN
Lopez-Lopez v. The Robinson School, et al
as 19-1386
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGEL M. NARAVEZ-MORELL, MARIA TERESA LARRIEU, MELVIN SANTONI-CRESPO and others
Defendant:
ASPEN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, MEDICAL DEFENSE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA LOPEZ-LOPEZ
Worman, et al v. Healey, et al
as 18-1545
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE and CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae:
ROYCE BARONDES, GREATER BOSTON INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION, MASSACHUSETTS CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SETH WORMAN, ANTHONY LINDEN, JASON WILLIAM SAWYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. MCKEON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police, MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, KERRY GILPIN, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANDREW FELD
Cruz v. Hagel, et al
as 16-1378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL CRUZ
Defendant:
LEON PANETA, Secretary of Defense
Defendant - Appellee:
DODEA-DDESS, DoD Education Activity, Domestic Dependents Elementary and Secondary Schools and CHUCK HAGEL, Secretary of Defense
Stalcup v. Department of Defense Agency
as 16-1225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS STALCUP
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Office of the Secretary of Defense of the United States of America
Casey v. STG International, et al
as 15-1115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEANNE CASEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STG INTERNATIONAL, INC., DEBORAH LEE JAMES, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Air Force, SYLVIA M. BURWELL, in her capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and others
Defendant:
LEON E. PANETTA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense and JESSE BURK, individually and in her official capacity as Health Promotion Operation Manager at the Federal Occupational Health division of the Department of Health and Human Services
Strahan v. Roughead, et al
as 14-1635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY ROUGHEAD, Chief of Naval Operations, United States Navy, ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary, Department of Defense and DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary, Department of Navy
Interested Party:
FISH & RICHARDSON
AFDI, et al v. MBTA, et al
as 14-1289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE, PAMELA GELLER and ROBERT SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
MA BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and BEVERLY A. SCOTT, individually and in her official capacity as Chief Executive Officer / General Manager of the MBTA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
