Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Castucci, et al v. US
as 09-2182
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
BRIAN CASTUCCI, DENISE CASTUCCI, RICHARD J. CASTUCCI and others
Defendant:
JOHN J. CONNOLLY, JOHN M. MORRIS, JAMES J. BULGER and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
US DISTRICT ATTORNEY, District Attorneys for the Suffolk, Norfolk, and Middlesex Districts of Massachusetts and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Donahue, et al v. FBI, et al
as 09-1950
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PATRICIA DONAHUE, Individually, and in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael J. Donahue, MICHAEL DONAHUE, SHAWN DONAHUE and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JOHN J. CONNOLLY, JOHN MORRIS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
:
The Estate of Edward Brian Hal v. US, et al
as 09-1951
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF EDWARD BRIAN HALLORAN, by Patricia Marie Maccarelli, in her capacity as Administratrix of The Estate of Edward Brian Halloran
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, acting through the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN J. CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party:
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
The Estate of Edward Brian Hal v. US, et al
as 09-1952
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF EDWARD BRIAN HALLORAN, by Patricia Marie Maccarelli, in her capacity as Administratrix of The Estate of Edward Brian Halloran
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, acting through the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN J. CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party:
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stuen-Parker v. US, et al
as 09-1891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JON CHRISTOPHER STUEN-PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, JOHN CONNOLLY, JOHN M. MORRIS and others
Sutliffe, et al v. Epping School District, et al
as 08-2587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS SUTLIFFE, DONALD SISSON, NANCY LEE GRIMARD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
EPPING SCHOOL DISTRICT, EPPING, NH, BARBARA D. MUNSEY, as Superintendent of Schools for Administrative Unit #14 and others
Latorraca, et al v. Taniki Financial Corporation, et al
as 08-2477
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAL LATORRACA, JOHN M. BABINGTON, EDWARD CAMPANELLI and others
Defendant:
A. URI LEVY, JAY ALIX AND ASSOCIATES, MEDIAJET, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
TANIKI FINANCIAL CORPORATION
:
Rhode Island Fishermen's Allia, et al v. Rhode Island Department of Env, et al
as 08-2390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RHODE ISLAND FISHERMEN'S ALLIANCE, by and through its President, Richard Fuka, STEVEN RILEY, Individually, BRIAN LOFTES, Individually and others
Defendant - Appellee:
W. MICHAEL SULLIVAN, in his capacity as the Directror of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, AL CHRISTOPHER, LANNY DELLINGER and others
Chalupowski, et al v. Metaxas, et al
as 08-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHESTER J. CHALUPOWSKI, individually and as beneficiary of the 26-30 Andrew St. Realty Trust and as beneficiary of the Mary Jane Calupowski Family Trust and MALGORZATA B. CHALUPOWSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY METAXAS, individually and as a partner in the Metaxas Norman and Pidgeon LLP, PETER C. DIGANGI, individually and in his capacity as a Circuit Judge of the Probate and Family Court, PAMELA CASEY O'BRIEN, individually and in her capacity as a Register of Probate, Essex Probate and Family Court and others
Limone, et al v. US, et al
as 08-1328
Plaintiff:
PETER J. LIMONE, OLYMPIA LIMONE, PETER J. LIMONE and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
EDWARD GRECO
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DENNIS CONDON, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
:
, , and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
