Cases 1 - 10 of 1,256
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maroney, et al v. Fiorentini
as 24-1508
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MARONEY, as Trustee of Premiere Realty Trust and MARONEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
JAMES J. FIORENTINI, indivisually and in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Haverhill, ROBERT E. WARD, individually and in his capacity as Deputy Director of Public Works of the City of Haverhill Water/Wastewater Division and HAVERHILL, MA
Maroney, et al v. Fiorentini, et al
as 24-1461
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MARONEY, as Trustee of Premiere Realty Trust and MARONEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
JAMES J. FIORENTINI, individually and in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Haverhill, HAVERHILL, MA and ROBERT E. WARD, individually and in his capacity as Deputy Director of Public Works of the City of Haverhill Water/Wastewater Division
Correa E Silva, et al v. Garland
as 24-1471
Petitioner:
RICARDO CORREA E SILVA, AMANDA FORTES DA SILVA CORREA, A. F. D. S. C. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Quindi-Quizhpilema, et al v. Garland
as 24-1466
Petitioner:
BLANCA JANNETH QUINDI-QUIZHPILEMA and E. M.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Soscia Holdings, LLC v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 24-1397
Plaintiff:
SOSCIA HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, TERENCE GRAY, individually and in his capacity as the Director of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management and others
Interested Party:
STEVEN J. RILEY
Johnson v. Ocasio-Montanez, et al
as 24-1423
Petitioner:
OBE E. JOHNSON
Respondent:
LUIS OCASIO-MONTANEZ and DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ
US v. Carpenter
as 24-1389
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DANIEL E. CARPENTER
Interested Party:
BRIAN FITZGERALD, Estate of Byron Darling and ESTATE OF BYRON DARLING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
