Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1414
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ritrovato v. United States Postal Service Federal Credit Union
as 23-1865
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS A. RITROVATO, III
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Alvarez v. US, et al
as 20-1387
Plaintiff / Appellant: JORGE L. ALVAREZ
Defendant / Appellee: MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1497
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
NLRB v. USPS
as 16-1989
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Interested Party: AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
NLRB v. USPS
as 16-1937
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Interested Party: AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 387
Chase v. United States Postal Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1351
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT CHASE
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MICHEAL KING and UNITED STATES, as sole defendant on Counts III, IV, and V.
NLRB v. United States Postal Service
as 15-1973
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Interested Party: SCOTT HOFFMAN
NLRB v. United States Postal Service
as 14-2010
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Interested Party: YAMIL PIZARRO, Union Delegate APWU, AFL-CIO, Puerto Rico Area Local 1070
NLRB v. US Postal Service
as 14-1218
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Interested Party: SCOTT HOFFMAN and LOUIS M. PENTO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?