Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 171 - 180 of 217
City of Methuen v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv10035
Plaintiff: City of Methuen
Defendant: Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Methuen v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv10035
Plaintiff: City of Methuen
Defendant: Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Woburn v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv10032
Defendant: Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff: City of Woburn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Sabana Grande et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2017cv02380
Plaintiff: Municipality of Sabana Grande and Municipality of Cayey
Defendant: Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Greenfield, v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv30175
Plaintiff: Greenfield, City of
Defendant: Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Teamsters Health Service and Insurance Plan Local 404 v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP et al
as 1:2017cv12342
Plaintiff: Teamsters Health Service and Insurance Plan Local 404
Defendant: PURDUE PHARMA, LP, PURDUE PHARMA, INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Teamsters Health Service and Insurance Plan Local 404 v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP et al
as 3:2017cv12342
Plaintiff: Teamsters Health Service and Insurance Plan Local 404
Defendant: Purdue Pharma, LP, Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC et al (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv12653
Defendant: Shire PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution, Inc., Meijer, Inc. and BI-LO, LLC
Intervenor Defendant: Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2005
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, SUPERVALU, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY and others
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2006
Plaintiff: SUPERVALU, INC., VALUE DRUG COMPANY, KROGER COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, MICHIGAN REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND, A.F. OF L. - A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?