Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
FOMB, et al v. Pabon Bosques, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff: FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Appellant: LUIS F. PABON BOSQUES, RAUL MARTINEZ PEREZ, ELVIN A. ROSADO MORALES and others
Defendant: PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY, LUIS M. COLLAZO RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacities as Administrator of the Retirement System for Employees of the Government of Puerto Rico and Executive Director of the Government of Puerto Rico Retirement Board and others
Interested Party: FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO MENDEZ
Cameros-Blanco v. Garland
as 23-1987
Petitioner: GLORIA MARINA CAMEROS-BLANCO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
FOMB, et al v. AmeriNational Community Services, LLC, et al
as 23-1747
Petitioner: FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Petitioner / Appellant: AMERINATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES, LLC, as servicer for the GDB Debt Recovery Authority and CANTOR-KATZ COLLATERAL MONITOR LLC, as collateral monitor for DRA Bondholders
Respondent / Appellee: INVESCO ADVISERS, INC., YUSIF MAFUZ-BLANCO, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY and others
Appellee: FIR TREE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP
Interested Party: GDB DEBT RECOVERY AUTHORITY and KROLL RESTRUCTURING ADMINISTRATION LLC
Donis-Hernandez de Cabrera, et al v. Garland
as 23-1266
Petitioner: ANA LUISA DONIS-HERNANDEZ DE CABRERA, GUSTAVO ADOLFO CABRERA-BLANCO, GUSTAVO EMILIANO CABRERA-DONIS and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Mayendia-Blanco
as 22-1905
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: ALEJANDRO E. MAYENDIA-BLANCO
In Re: Puerto Rico Public Finance Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01517
Petitioner: Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico
Plaintiff: AmeriNational Community Services, LLC
Respondent: Invesco Advisers, Inc. and Yusif Mafuz-Blanco
Trustee: US Bank Trust National Association and US Bank National Association
Not Classified By Court: Fir Tree Capital Management, LP
Not Yet Classified: Cantor-Katz Collateral Monitor LLC
Interested Party: Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC and Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blanco Contreras, et al v. Garland
as 22-1538
Petitioner: JULIO BENIGNO BLANCO CONTRERAS and GLORIA ISABEL MARMOL LOPEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Oriental Financial Services, LLC v. Esparza et al
as 3:2021cv01471
Petitioner: Oriental Financial Services, LLC
Respondent: Jose Luis Esparza, Egdaliz Blanco de Esparza, JL Esparza, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
In Re: Da Graca, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2117
Interested Party: OSVALDO MOTA, ANDREA JOY JAMES, LUCAS VALENTIM and others
Petitioner: JOAO AMADO, FRED KAYITARE, CONROY LEWIS and others
Respondent: THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff, STEVEN J. SOUZA, Superintendent Bristol County House of Corrections in his Official Capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party: JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner: MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?