Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kaul v. Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc., et al
as 21-1686
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD ARJUN KAUL
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON PARTNERS GLOBAL INVESTORS, INC., STATE STREET CORPORATION, CHRIS CHRISTIE, in his ex-official and individual capacity and others
Defendant:
PETER STAATS and JAY HOWARD SOLOMON, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00275
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Quigley et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2014cv13808
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Quigley , Charles Street Family Chiropractic, Inc. , Christian Di Ferrante and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts and Health Care Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. Knitting Fever, Inc., et al
as 13-2302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASCADE YARNS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
KNITTING FEVER, INC., a New York corporation, DESIGNER YARNS, LTD, a Corporation of England, EMMEPIEFFE, SRL, an entity organized or existing under the laws of Italy and others
Interested Party:
CASHMERE AND CAMEL HAIR MANUFACTURERS' INSTITUTE
Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. Knitting Fever, Inc. et.al
as 1:2011mc91332
Plaintiff:
Cascade Yarns, Inc.
Defendant:
Knitting Fever, Inc, Designer Yarns, LTD, Emmepieffe SRL and others
Atlantic Shipping Company, Inc. v. Di Nos Shipping, Inc.
as 1:2011cv11419
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Shipping Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Di Nos Shipping, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Gurur Tekstil Iletisim Sanayi ve Dis Ticaret Ltd. Sti. v. Converse, Inc.
as 1:2008mc10122
Petitioner:
Gurur Tekstil Iletisim Sanayi ve Dis Ticaret Ltd. Sti., Gurur Tekstil Iletisim Sanayi ve Dis Ticaret Ltd. Sti. and Gurur Tekstil Iletisim Sanayi ve Dis Ticaret Ltd. Sti.
Respondent:
Converse, Inc.
Zhang v. Holder
as 08-1099
Petitioner:
FENG DI ZHANG
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
