Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Jones v. Gelb, et al
as 15-1680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, The Commisioner of the Department of Correction (DOC), THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent of S.B.C.C, ROBBY R. DOBB, The Liutenant at S.B.C.C and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE GELB, Former Deputy Superintendent of Operation at S.B.C.C, JOE FREITAS, The Lieutenant at MCI, CJ, MICHAEL D. FARLEY, The Sergeant at S.B.C.C and others
Jones v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2015fp00083
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Ryan
as 1:2014cv14204
Petitioner:
Timothy E. Jones
Respondent:
Kelly Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rua v. Glodis, et al
as 14-2158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN A. RUA
Defendant - Appellee:
GUY W. GLODIS, Office of the Sheriff, KATHY WISNIEWSKI and THOMAS R. PATNAUDE, Former Primary Care Physician
Defendant:
SUE ROGERS, Medical Department MD, GERALDINE SOMERS, Present/Primary Care Physician, PAMELA A. JONES, Medical Department Nurse and others
FOURNIER v. LEPAGE et al
as 1:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
FRANK DANIEL FOURNIER
Defendant:
PAUL LEPAGE, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, JOSEPH PONTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2014cv00250
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner:
Ricky Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. USA
as 1:2014cv12096
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Eddie Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rasheed v. D'Antonio, et al
as 14-1220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RASHAD AKEEM RASHEED
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA D'ANTONIO, MARLENE DODGE, DYANA NICKL and others
Jones v. Suffolk County D.A., et al
as 14-1097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SUFFOLK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, ZACHARY HILLMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
