Cases 91 - 100 of 527
SYMQUEST GROUP INC v. BATES MILL DERMATOLOGY PLLC
as 2:2019cv00540
Plaintiff:
SYMQUEST GROUP INC
Defendant:
BATES MILL DERMATOLOGY PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPLIN/MARINO PROPERTIES INC v. GAP INC
as 2:2019cv00439
Plaintiff:
CAMPLIN/MARINO PROPERTIES INC
Defendant:
GAP INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'HARA CORPORATION v. AUTONAV MARINE SYSTEMS INC et al
as 2:2019cv00467
Defendant:
PAUL WAGNER and AUTONAV MARINE SYSTEMS INC
Plaintiff:
O'HARA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
CAMPLIN v. DAS ACQUISITION COMPANY LLC
as 2:2019cv00474
Defendant:
DAS ACQUISITION COMPANY LLC
Plaintiff:
MORGAN A CAMPLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC v. FORT LAUDERDALE VETERINARY CENTER INC
as 2:2019cv00411
Defendant:
FORT LAUDERDALE VETERINARY CENTER INC
Plaintiff:
IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEVESQUE et al v. IBERDROLA SA et al
as 2:2019cv00389
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PLATT, SYLVIA KRAINING, SALLY TRUSSELL and others
Defendant:
DOUGLAS HERLING, CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY, IBERDROLA SA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
NORTHERN ELECTRIC INC v. BLACK HORSE GROUP LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00462
Defendant:
BLACK HORSE GROUP LLC and HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
NORTHERN ELECTRIC INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC v. DANIEL A LAURIDIA DVM PC
as 2:2019cv00412
Defendant:
DANIEL A LAURIDIA DVM PC
Plaintiff:
IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FEDEQ DV004 LLC et al v. CITY OF PORTLAND et al
as 2:2019cv00382
Plaintiff:
FEDEQ DV004 LLC and FEDEQ DV005 LLC
Defendant:
JON P JENNINGS and CITY OF PORTLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WVUE 2015-1 v. DOONAN GRAVES & LONGORIA LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00364
Defendant:
JOHN A DOONAN, ESQ and DOONAN GRAVES & LONGORIA LLC
Plaintiff:
WVUE 2015-1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
