Cases 81 - 90 of 329
NADEAU v. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
ROBERT N NADEAU
Defendant:
SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Sebastino v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co.
as 3:2016cv30007
Plaintiff:
Gene Sebastino
Defendant:
Springfield Terminal Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Walker v. Massachusetts Bay Commuter Rail Company LLC et al
as 1:2015cv13507
Plaintiff:
Mark Walker
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Commuter Rail Company LLC, Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority and Keolis Commuter Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Estate of Angel Otero-Ortiz v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv02280
Defendant:
United States of America and Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Estate of Angel Otero-Ortiz and Yinnaris Otero-del Valle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Martinez-Medina v. United States Department of Agriculture-Rural Development
as 3:2015cv01859
Plaintiff:
Maria Martinez-Medina
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture-Rural Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Menezes v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv12348
Plaintiff:
Harriet Menezes
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Maziarz v. Brennan
as 3:2015cv30098
Plaintiff:
Mary A Maziarz
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Leposa v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (AMTRAK) et al
as 1:2015cv10922
Plaintiff:
Gregory Leposa
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp. (AMTRAK) and Keolis Commuter Services, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cardwell v. Providence & Worcester Railroad CO.
as 4:2015cv40047
Plaintiff:
Brooks Cardwell
Defendant:
Providence & Worcester Railroad CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Bouvier v. Bush, et al
as 15-1076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLA BOUVIER
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE W. BUSH, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON and JOHN KERRY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
