Cases 61 - 70 of 5,420
Sandsbury v. Teers et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Eugene Sandsbury
Defendant:
John Teers and D.C.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Honore v. Garrett et al
as 1:2024cv10351
Plaintiff:
Jean Honore
Defendant:
Larico Garrett and Quality Midwestern Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Tadros et al v. Marriott P.R. Management et al
as 3:2024cv01171
Plaintiff:
Samer Tadros, Amanda Tadros and Tadros Conjugal Society
Defendant:
Marriott P.R. Management and AIG Insurance Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Acevedo Vives v. US
as 24-1133
Plaintiff:
MAYDA I. ACEVEDO and MAYDA I. ACEVEDO VIVES
Defendant:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES and US ATTORNEYS OFFICE, for the District of Puerto Rico
Rich v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 1:2024cv10374
Plaintiff:
Carole Rich
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Other:
Judge Marianne B. Bowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lawson v. WS Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lawson
Defendant:
WS Asset Management, Inc., Garden City Owner LLC, Crossharbor Capital Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Triplett v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv10657
Plaintiff:
Latrice Triplett
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation and Cadence Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Raheb v. Delaware North Companies, Inc. - Boston, et al
as 24-1230
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER RAHEB
Defendant:
DELAWARE NORTH COMPANIES, INC. - BOSTON, d/b/a TD Garden and UG2, LLC
Steele v. Boston Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv10890
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Shirley Williams Steele
Defendant:
Boston Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dudurkaewa v. R3 Education INC.
as 1:2024cv10891
Plaintiff:
Petimat Dudurkaewa
Defendant:
R3 EDUCATION INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
