Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Vincent v. Flagship Services Corporation
as 3:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Megan Vincent and Megan A. Vincent
Defendant:
Flagship Services Corporation, Flagship Services Corporation doing business as Verdanza Hotel and Y Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Annick Roy, et al v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co, et al
as 17-1108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNICK ROY, as special administrator of the Estate of Jean-Guy Veilleux, deceased; individually and as next friend of minor FRV, SAMUEL AUDET, BELAND AUDET and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway, DELAWARE AND HUDSON RAILROAD COMPANY INC., d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway and others
Movant:
ROBERT JAMES KEACH
Irwin, et al v. Eclectic Dining, Inc.
as 16-1142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEGAN IRWIN and THOMAS IRWIN, individually and as Father and next friend of minors Children M.I., M.I. and T.I.
Defendant - Appellee:
ECLECTIC DINING, INC., d/b/a Atlantica's Olde Salt Restaurant
Jimenez-Pizarro et al v. Empresas Diaz, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01052
Plaintiff:
Carlos Jimenez-Pizarro , Michelle Fretchell-Silva and Legal Partnership Jimenez-Fretchell
Defendant:
Empresas Diaz, Inc., Betteroads Asphalt Corporation, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pesce v. Jo-Ann Stores, LLC
as 1:2014cv14253
Plaintiff:
Megan Pesce
Defendant:
JO-ANN STORES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Irwin et al v. Eclectic Dining, Inc.
as 1:2013cv10974
Plaintiff:
Megan Irwin and Thomas Irwin
Defendant:
Eclectic Dining, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Satloff v. Sargent et al
as 1:2007cv11203
Plaintiff:
David Satloff
Defendant:
Susan Sargent, PhD, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
