Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cruz et al v. Raymond Talmadge et al
as 1:2015cv13258
Plaintiff:
Megan Cruz , Matthew Cruz , Barbara Ellerbe and others
Defendant:
Raymond Talmadge, Samuel J. Jackson, Prevost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Corless et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03826
Plaintiff:
Sandra Corless , Barbara Adams , Edward Arias and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Murphy v. Fresenius USA, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv11857
Plaintiff:
Linda Murphy
Defendant:
Fresenius U.S.A., Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. , FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Murphy et al v. I-Flow Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv11260
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy and Pauline Murphy
Defendant:
I-Flow Corporation , DJO, LLC and DJO Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Murphy v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2010cv10349
Plaintiff:
Gerald Murphy and Gerald Murphy
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Murphy v. Snap-On, Inc.
as 1:2008cv11555
Plaintiff:
Patrick Murphy
Defendant:
Snap-On, Inc. and Snap-On, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Reyes-Rivera et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv02128
Plaintiff:
Cruz Reyes-Rivera, Luz Rodriguez-Andino, Norma Olivera-Colon and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In Re: Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2007md01842
Plaintiff:
Deborah June Bilbrey, Wendy H. Risley, Lois Askins and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc, WCO Medical Products Corporation, Baolien Nguyen Tu and others
Interested Party:
Ernest Cory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
