Cases 1 - 6 of 6
IN RE: Covidien Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation No. II
as 1:2022md03029
Plaintiff:
Bradley D. Easom, Attila Vince Streyar, Kayla M Winters and others
Defendant:
Covidien LP, Covidien Holding Inc., Covidien, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norris v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1003
Interested Party:
PLAINTIFFS' STEERING COMMITTEE, INTERVENTIONAL SPINE & SPORTS MEDICINE, PC, MICHAEL D. O'NEAL and others
Defendant:
ADIL KATABAY, ANDREW HOWDEN, PREMIER ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARKO, GLADYS G. AUSTIN, ROSANNE BROOKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOCELYN KAE NORRIS
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH LISTER, M.D., P.C. and KENNETH R. LISTER
McCall v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 1:2015cv13927
Plaintiff:
Ashley McCall
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCall v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv11769
Plaintiff:
Craig McCall
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCall et al v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv11418
Plaintiff:
Kerry McCall
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCALL et al v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., et al
as 1:2014cv10484
Plaintiff:
LINDA MCCALL
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MANUFACTURING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
