Antitrust Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 89
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10452
Plaintiff: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant: Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. , Impax Laboratories, Inc. , Lupin Limited and others
Respondent: SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 25 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
LOCAL 274 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10439
Plaintiff: LOCAL 274 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant: Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Movant: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv10453
Plaintiff: PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND
Defendant: Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Movant: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff: Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court: National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant: Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re: Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff: Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
City of Providence, Rhode Island v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv00771
Plaintiff: City of Providence, Rhode Island
Defendant: Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc., Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Everett Aluminum Inc v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv12972
Defendant: Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., GS Power Holdings LLC, JPMorgan Chase & Company and others
Plaintiff: Everett Aluminum Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Pierce Aluminum Company, Inc. v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv12746
Plaintiff: Pierce Aluminum Company, Inc.
Defendant: Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. , GS Power Holdings LLC , Metro International Trade Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv12517
Plaintiff: Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant: Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013md02472
Plaintiff: Fraternal Order of Police Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Rite-Aid Corporation and others
Defendant: Warner Chilcott Holdings Company III, Ltd., Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC, Warner Chilcott Company, LLC and others
Interested Party: Health Care Service Corporation, Caremark, LLC, CVS Health Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv12435
Plaintiff: International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39 Health & Welfare Trust Fund
Defendant: Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?