Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Cummisford v. Shire US Inc et al
as 1:2017cv10156
Plaintiff:
Sherri Cummisford
Defendant:
Shire U.S. Inc. , Shire LLC , Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Shire LLC et al
as 1:2017cv10050
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Defendant:
Shire LLC, Shire U.S., Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC et al (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint)
as 1:2016cv12653
Defendant:
Shire PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Meijer Distribution, Inc., Meijer, Inc. and BI-LO, LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ahold USA, Inc. v. Allergan, PLC (f/k/a Actavis, PLC) et al
as 1:2016cv11498
Plaintiff:
Ahold USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Allergan, PLC (f/k/a Actavis, PLC), Allergan, Inc., Allergan USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City of Providence v. Allergan PLC et al
as 1:2016cv00214
Plaintiff:
City of Providence
Defendant:
Allergan PLC, Actavis PLC, Lannett Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company et al
as 1:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. , Rite Aid Corporation and Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp
Defendant:
Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company, Warner Chilcott Company, Inc., Warner Chilcott Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City of Providence, RI, et al v. Warner Chilcott Company, LLC, et al
as 15-1250
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE, RI, individually and on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOC. OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY, III, LTD. and others
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Liti, et al, et al
as 14-2071
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE, RI, individually and on behalf of itself andall others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOC. OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY, III, LTD. and others
City of Providence, Rhode Island v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
City of Providence, Rhode Island
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walgreen Co et al v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company et al
as 1:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co , The Kroger Co. , Safeway, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company, Warner Chilcott Company Inc., Warner Chilcott Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
